10 Minutes Gone

Objectively this is a cliched dud, but if you enjoy Mystery Science Theatre 3000 you'll like this. It's entertaining and fun to poke holes at it.

One of the worst action movies I have ever seen, specially considering that Bruce Willis is at this.

Completely by the numbers.

It wasn't as bad as the ratings indicated as I thought the story was still engaging and kept you guessing who done it. The story was a little weak as it didn't really develop any of the characters or make you care about them, considering the strength of cast with Willis & Chiklis we would have expected more or cheated some.

It's difficult to objectively rate this since the news of Bruce Willis' medical condition became known. That, of course, explains his performance in this film. Setting that aside, "10 Minutes Gone" is pretty awful. All of it. The script, especially, stands out: it sounds almost lifted from some 1940's gangster film. I kept waiting for someone to refer to the Meadow Williams character as a "moll." Give this a pass.

10 minutes gone? More like an hour and a half gone. Absolute waste of time.

Within the opening minutes you know, yes you really know this is going to be rubbish. The directing and busy busy use of camera movement is ridiculous. What we're the director and Bruce Willis trying to do pay homage to the poorest of B movies. You just want to put the camera where the sun don't shine. Poor everything.

Filmes com assalto a bancos/cofres sempre me atraem, quando tudo dá errado melhor ainda, com muitas perseguições e alguma revolta se torna mais adorável, nada novo, mas entretêm, Bruce Willis ganhando dinheiro fácil, só paradim num escritório, nem põe a mão na massa... O filme parece um jogo de resta 1, abate atrás de abate, mas o plot twist estava meio previsível né, quem não suspeitou do grande traidor, só o protagonista…

86 minutes, gone. Honestly, this script offered what could have been snappy 1930s type noir lingo, which can be slick when delivered well. Possibly should have been set in a different decade so we'd enjoy that more. But it dragged. I wondered why Bruce Willis was billed as a star rather than supporting character, and maybe he did, too, because he was phoning it in. Maybe that was transmitted to the entire set and crew? Would there have been more passion about acting without him? And that Texas actor...it would be hard to even read lines with that. I felt like a read through got filmed and put in the can, so to speak. Maybe it's my gender, but plotwise, it was pretty clear who was not trustworthy from the jump on this thing. It's a shame that some people got caught up in this, and I don't know if there were crazy budget constraints preventing a greater push for zest, or what. If there was a soundtrack, it's forgotten, so maybe that's a factor as well.

Apart from the dialogue this is a great movie. Michael Chiklis really sell “Frank” and there are many other roles that can sell the dialogue. However, Bruce Willis sounds flat on every line. Shout out to Mr. Willis, but it doesn’t seem like his heart wasn’t in the job. This movie is worth watching because of its grit and plot. Some characters make you believe their story which make it more fun as a plot based movie set in Cincinnati.