14 Cameras

audience Reviews

, 22% Audience Score
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    Horrible, from the start to the end. I'm actually surprised I watched the entire movie.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    Very eye opening and unsettling movie. Great acting by Neville, would have been a difficult character to play. Movies like this concern me as there risks of planting ideas into the wrong persons head. Personal opinion looking from a ‘outside the movie’ situation.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Neville was a genius actor. No one can replace him in this series. 15 cams was abysmal.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    What a weird film! While the camera angle is creepy, it's unclear what the motivations of the creep is. He's clearly big into money, but occasional kidnapping, murder, voyeurism...who knows! He seems to communicate with the boy fine but then most of the movie he just grunts? Why is he so purple-red all over all the time? The cinematography is OK. Suddenly about half way through people can't speak without cursing fifty times in a row when the first half they barely cursed at all. That made it feel like writers changed half way through the script. It's a mess!
  • Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
    As someone who liked the first movie very much, unfortunately the second movie follows the same logic except for a few additions. However, it could have turned into a much more interesting movie if it had deepened the auction added to the movie.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    The greatest 1.5 hours ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    Sequel to 13 Cameras, this does not pick up where the other movie left off, but several years ahead. It retains similar creep factor, but less storyline. Some of it was a little suspenseful, though predictable. The ending was kind of weird.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    Despite the bad reviews, I actually thought the 2nd movie was better then the first, but at absolute least, it was a respectable sequel. The ending didn't really do a very good job of closing out the family's story, and that was probably the movies biggest weakness. Instead, they focused more on the story of the villain.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    How am I supposed to believe this old man who can barely walk, who looks like he is going to drop dead at any moment, overpower everyone in this movie? The movie took the worst parts from the original and amplified it. The 1-Dimensional characters don't help it either. It was just bad.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    It was okay. A bit on the boring side at first but it picks up.