22 Jump Street
audience Reviews
, 77% Audience Score- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsAlmost as good as the first one but some parts just weren't right and got saved by the general film
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsMuch better than the first one.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsreally funny movie, really changed my mood...
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsAs if the first one wasn't bad enough, hokeywood foists this homoerotic drek on us. Again Jonah Whale can't act.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars"My name is Jeff". Legendary line
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsNot as good but it does its job.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsWell it looks like this sequel is indeed a step up from the predecessor. Again well done in all departments, with wacky, off -beat and self reflecting humor. Enough action and weirdness to entertain. Cast excels again in character, overall cinematography very good. A laugh worth your while
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars"22 Jump Street" is a rare sequel that not only recaptures the magic of its predecessor but elevates it with sharper humor and self-aware absurdity. Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum’s chemistry remains impeccable, delivering non-stop laughs through their exaggerated yet endearing dynamic. The film thrives on its meta-humor, openly mocking the tropes of sequels while leaning into its over-the-top antics with infectious enthusiasm. Directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller keep the energy high; blending action and comedy effortlessly. Packed with clever gags, ridiculous set pieces and a brilliantly absurd end credits sequence, 22 Jump Street is a comedy sequel done right - bigger, funnier and fully in on the joke.
- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 starsJust every bit of ok. They poked fun again at the genre and the last movie. I was ready to hate on it and yet again the captain especially, was a great character. Some of the plot was just dumb, the villain was totally forgettable, despite a good actor. But in the end I laughed and had a decent time. Not as good as 21, but the ending was hilarious and well worth sticking this one out for.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsRight up there with the first one but just a touch shy so I dropped it a half star.