65

audience Reviews

, 65% Audience Score
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    It’s ok. It’s worth watching once
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Not a amazing movie had lots of hype for this movie, very slowed paced and very boring the only good thing was the dinosaur scene overall not a great movie
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    I enjoyed the fantasy 'After Earth' kinda of feel. Story was a little slow, but found it quite refreshing. A good watch.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    This movie would have been a huge hit in 1981. However, it seems a bit out of place for today's audience. It's not a bad movie for what it is, but it could have been so much more. I have no idea why they give away a major story detail at the very beginning of the film that could have been held to the end as a surprise...
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    So a spaceship travelling in outer space gets hits by meteors ... so it crashes on a planet with the pilot shouting 'I'm hit and going down'. It's a spaceship, not a Spitfire! From there the movie gets dafter.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Best movie I've ever seen, I hope that there will one day be a sequel called 66
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    The idea of aliens crash landing on earth 65 million years ago has SO MUCH potential, just to be wasted on whatever this was. If you're going to be specific about the where and when, then why not be accurate in the film? I was so excited when I saw a velociraptor at the right size for once, but then the rest of the movie mostly features made up dinosaurs, including 4 legged long-bodied goanna/croc/t-rex mutations of various sizes, and a cave-dwelling oviraptosaur twice the size of Adam Driver, running through a cave system Adam barely fit through... Not to mention that the [spoiler] "12 hours until impact" scenario should have meant that the visible comet would be on the other side of the planet at the time of impact. I'm not a scientist but I'm not an idiot either, as I'm sure most people aren't, by the look of these reviews. If you're gonna waste $45m on special effects, wouldn't it be the same amount of effort to make believable and interesting scenarios and dinosaurs?
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Pretty dumb movie with a dumb plot. Not enough character development and arc (while the movie wants to be overly dramatic). Lazy writing. Just feels like it was rushed.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Comienza la película y describe que los eventos ocurren "Antes de la Humanidad", corte a, aparecen humanos.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Better to leave the dinosaurs to Spielberg's Jurassic franchise.