Beast of Burden

audience Reviews

, 11% Audience Score
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    One of the most painfully boring,badly edited,and laborious movies I have ever had the displeasure to watch. By the time the movie draws on its final half hour, You're hoping everyone in the movie dies because there's no one in the movie worth rooting for but the predator drone.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    The best and most reliable crypto recovery expert service for me ever goes to CYBER GENIE HACK PRO! Wow; these guys are so good at their job and their customer service relationship is so friendly and reliable. I made a huge error with a transaction at work, sending $68,000 worth of BTC to the wrong wallet address. Tension arose and I was literally shaking even while I searched online for a possible solution. I contacted the customer support of the wallet address provider but they said they couldn't help. I was about to pay my company money I never spent till I read something about CYBER GENIE HACK PRO Recovery services and I immediately contacted them. Because the money hadn't been withdrawn and contacted on time, they were able to retrace the transaction, and the money was credited back to the company's wallet swiftly. How would I have explained to the company I am innocent, CYBER GENIE saved my life. "http: // cybergeniehackpro (.) x y z " (+12)(5)(25)(12)(03)(91)..
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    This movie was so boring. Most of the movie was him sitting in a plane talking on a cell phone to various people. Don't watch it.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    Daniel Radcliffe (What If, Jungle) carries this movie past it's bland storytelling
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    In a word: dreadful. A completely implausible plot, no tension, suspense, or thrill and therefore poor pacing, a ridiculous number of phone calls, unconvincing acting, undeveloped, generic characters, constant short flashbacks, budget CGI, blatantly fake sets/props, overly dark visuals, leading to horrible compression on streaming services, and a silly, booming soundtrack that was laughably inappropriate make this a film to avoid. It's basically a badly made mix of Locke and American Made, with no redeeming qualities.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    Prima mezz'ora a dir poco confusionaria, si capisce ben poco della trama; e anche quando diventa più comprensibile rimane comunque ai limiti del surreale. Veramente per qualche kg di droga si abbatte un drone in volo con una pistola??
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Very slow. Only picked up in the last few minutes.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    Its almost as if critics are so afraid to say a single bad thing about Daniel Radcliffe, that after Harry Potter it's almost always how the movie let him down, or how even his great acting could not save a bad movie. Let's be frank, everything was bad here.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    Interesante historia con un final pedorro
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    For those whose sterile style exercises like "Locke" (Knight, 2013) and "The Guilty" (Moller, 2018) weren't enough, here's another identical one. (Mauro Lanari)