Biosphere
audience Reviews
, 61% Audience Score- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 starsThough it ends in an unsatisfying way, it's interesting along the way.
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsThis was okay. Like frogs, these guys found a way.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsOne of the best films I've seen in recent times, criminally underrated! I hope these creators make more stuff soon. Great writing, surprising & rich performances. Truly compelling execution, manages to stay light & entertaining while tackling some boggling concepts. Also amazing what it manages with such low budget... reminded me of all the best things about reading a quality short story, or watching the kind of theatre production which reminds you of how good theatre can be. Seems divisive (just look at the extreme reviews here) but highly recommend trying it out.
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsTeam-up of Duplass and Sterling K. Brown ignites conversations This movie was pretty well done and definitely did a good job of taking a subject matter that would be seen as sensitive to many people and making it tangible yet watchable (barely). The realism of the end-of-the-world scenario is done pretty well, and the two leads are very enjoyable. Both Mark Duplass and Sterling K. Brown shine, individually, and can lean on each other's performances well. The foreshadowing is done intriguingly in some parts yet leaves the viewer off with many questions in other parts. While the wrap-up is conclusive, the journey to get to it is definitely a bumpy ride. The movie is brave for tackling the subject matter of men becoming unwilling transgenders and deserves some credit. However, by leaving the ending completely open for interpretation, it sort of deliberately misses its mark. Mark Duplass has masterminded many projects in his career, and this is a good example of how interesting his projects can be. Sterling K. Brown, on the other hand, has filled roles with inspiring acting which balances fun levity, serious gravity, and sharp brevity that makes his characters always eye-catching. Overall, this was a good movie, but clearly not for everyone to enjoy the same way.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsI have never reviewed a movie before, and promise myself today I will never write one again, for fear it may dilute this moment...my entire life I thought no art could be bad, because art by its nature of subjective and about personal connection with the work. This movie forced me to re-evaluate that. I guess if art crawls up its own ass far enough, it can achieve the impossible and lose every bit of value it once had from potential alone.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsWe watched about 30 minutes of the movie and then just fast forwarded randomly to see if the movie played out the way we expected and whether it got any better.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsI love ALL movies, and this one was just horrible. Contrary to other reviews, it was 100% predictable. There was no plot, which can be fine. The character development was shallow and didn't evolve. Completely pointless movie.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsInteresting premise that goes nowhere. Worse than nowhere they just keep talking and talking about the premise until the viewer either falls asleep or switches streams. There is nothing to see here.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsAnything that leaves you hanging on this long with zero results should give you a divorce settlement. It was interesting in first, but then went off the rails of the fish versus man conversion.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsIdeas with no execution, the directing is poor, the acting good for a stage production, maybe. Sorry, not a good movie, there is indeed nothing to watch.