Die Hard Dracula

Director and writer Peter Horak may have shot this in Prague and California, but it looks like the kind of movies that Cabellero and VCA put out in 1998 without you know, all the ejaculate. It also has a lead who loses his girl in a rowboat accident, which sends him to Europe, and into the orbit of — you knew it — Dracula (played by three actors, Ernest M. Garcia, Chaba Hrotko and Tom McGowan). Who can battle Dracula? How about Bruce Glover? Yes, Crispin's dad. Horak did stunts on Viva Knievel!, Throw Mama from the Train and more than twenty other films. I have no idea what made him write, produce and direct a comedy Dracula movie that is beyond brutally unfunny. I mean, I have no limit when it comes to evil — I mean bad movies — and this one really pushed me even worse than any other film has. Which means I loved the experience and I'd totally force you to watch it while screaming about why they made the choices they did. But why Die Hard Dracula?

Part nonsensical horror, part flat-faced comedy and part Prague travelogue, Die Hard Dracula is on a whole new level of ineptitude. The film plays like a home video, with abrupt cuts and an ever-tumbling tone, following a weedy teen lost in indecisive vampireland. There's painted cardboard sets, multicoloured car crashes, a Dracula whose hairstyle changes between takes and a supporting character who looks like the living incarnation of Super Mario. Despite how this may sound, it's rarely even unintentionally funny. In fact, it's utterly dreadful on all levels.

If Bram Stoker's mind was riddled with the worst case of ADHD known to man, his literary masterpiece would kinda resemble Die Hard Dracula, just slightly more competent, though. The plot makes no sense and having three polar-opposite looking actors play one Dracula makes even less sense. But it's got its own flying coffin, and despite the poor acting, lousy effects and humorless jokes (at least the intentional ones), how many other films can honestly say they have the benefit of featuring one of those? Full review at http://silverscreenfanatic.com/2015/04/06/what-the-hell-were-they-thinking-66/

I enjoy low-budget, cheezy horror flicks way more than the average joe does, so I thought I'd give this one a try. This one is far and away the cheeziest that I've ever seen. This looks like it could have been done as a Senior class project by an aspiring high-school film maker. I wouldn't say that it's so bad that it's GOOD, but it's certainly so bad that the cheeziness makes it at least more entertaining that your average Uwe Boll film.

Holy shit. I would give this a five, but it can only be watched in small amounts.

Possibly the worst movie ever made. It looked like it was a home video and the acting was horrible. Really nothing positive could be said about this movie. I can't believe this was ever released on DVD. The only thing I can say is that if you love watching bad movies this one is the worst.

1.6/10 It's hard to even put this in to words. This movie honestly looked like a group of people threw this together in a week using a camcorder. I believe they started off trying to make a serious movie, then tried to make it a comedy when they realized how bad it was, and then failed at making it into a comedy. From what I could gather (Without skipping through) A guys girlfriend drowns, he goes to Europe. Dracula wakes up. People turn into bad acting vampires, and there's a bad ending. European women must be really trusting, because they have no trouble walking up to shrouded, hideously disfigured strangers, completely unarmed. There's all of 2 seconds of female nudity in the film, but believe me, you'd be better off watching "Porky's". God forbid you actually buy this thing like I did. I suppose I should have taken a hint when a new DVD only cost me 5 bucks. This is also one of the only dvd's I've seen that had no menu or scene selection. Even Crummy bootlegs usually give you that much. Please don't think that you can buy this thing just to make fun of it. The bad comedy makes even that joy impossible. Movies like this are the basic reason why independent films are so heavily frowned upon. I'm sure the makers had good intentions, and they probably enjoyed making it. But even Troma films have a certain degree of cheap disgusting charm to them, this one is just soul less.

If you love bad movies then you have to see this one. Possibly the worst movie ever made.

bloody awful if you love bad "horror" films than this in the one for you

I disagree. The movie was hilarious, mostly because it looked like it was a homemade video. The acting also made it great... Van Helsing was too funny...The dracula changed about 3 times throughout the movie... I guess you have to have a good sense of humor to like this movie.