Gulliver's Travels

audience Reviews

, 27% Audience Score
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Quite a good film. I don't know why everyone is hating on it. Quite funny and features the awesome Jack Black.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    LOL, 1 hour and 25 minutes of humor. Rated PG for Brief Rude Humor, Action, and Mild Language. Starring Jack Black!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Filme bacana, o roteiro é bacaninha, as cenas sao bacaninhas, o elenco é bacaninha, e alguns ajudam a melhorar o filme, a história é mais ou menos, e o filme deveria ter cenas bem melhores e relevantes para fazer o filme ser bom.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    It is different from the original book yet it gives a weird modern vibe that is kind of enjoyable and teaches a simple but valuable lesson about the value of honesty and the consequences of a lie.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    Why does everyone hate this? I just found that out! I love this movie.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    The Most embarrassing film based on a book since Garfield 2.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    7/10 - Good and short.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    Fun fact about this movie: Although critics and audiences disliked it for being too gross and childish, the scene in which Gulliver saves the King from the fire in the palace by putting it out with urine is actually taken directly from Jonathan Swift's book. However, in the original novel, the person rescued in this manner is the Queen. The only other adaptation to include this scene is Gulliver's Travels (1996). Review: Fun, nothing more. The plot of the movie was out of place and time, I was surprised to hear when it was actually based on a novel,too bad the adaptation of it wasn't that good...Jack Black was literally the true Jack Black and kinda showed his true personality...For a comedy film it was way too out of place sometimes they tried to fit a romance snd an adventure genre in it,concepts that you can't put together perfectly and not make a mess, especially in a 2010 film.The ending was expected from the beginning and got me truly bored while watching i and ending exactly the way i predicted to lol.To be fair,i would recommend this movie to a friend caise why not it's a silly comedy and it's worth 1 and half hour of your time. Cinematography:6/10 Acting:7/10 Enjoyment:5/10 Casting:6/10 Soundtrack:6/10 Plot:5/10 Ending:5/10 Pacing:4/10 Writing:7/10 Environments:6/10 Overall:5.7/10
  • Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
    Rob Letterman's rendition of "Gulliver's Travels" is drowned by dull humor, bad acting (there are a few fine performances), and terrible script-writing. Unfortunately, the film's protagonist is unlikable for far too long of the runtime as well.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    It's funny how (and why) people expect something close to the classic book. It's just a movie to kill some free time and it does that.