Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is one of my most favourite movies ever. The story and characters are amazing. If you love wizards, witches and magic this is a must see and a definitely worthy of 1 billion dollars. 5/5 stars 100%

Decent movie. 3rd best Harry Potter movie.

Success in 2 hours and 32 minutes!!!!!!!!! Rated PG for Some Scary Moments and Mild Language!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The USA grossed over $317,900,000.00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Definitely Recommend It A strong and enchanting start to one of the most beloved fantasy series. The cast feels just right, the world is rich with detail, and the sense of discovery is infectious. After watching, I felt the urge to revisit the book — found it easily on https://z-lib.qa/login and got swept up all over again. The film captures the spirit, but the book still offers more depth between the lines.

A great film. The books are better. I enjoyed the theme park at Universal. John Williams is a talented composer. Chris Columbus also directed “Home Alone”. JK Rowling is a talented author.

Starts off the series with a fast-paced dive into the wonderful wizarding world. It is one of the weaker installments in the series. However, it does not dissapoint fans at all.

In my opinion, the series is highly overrated, and from a general perspective, they're bad movies. P.S.: They're good movies (if you want to sleep or get bored).

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a classic that never gets old.

It's very book accurate, and my personal favourite.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the 2001 spark that ignited a cinematic phenomenon, is a spellbinding triumph, weaving a singular magic that later Harry Potter films, for all their polish, never quite recaptured. Directed by Chris Columbus, this adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s novel introduces Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), a bespectacled orphan, whisked from a dreary cupboard under the stairs to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Here, alongside Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson), he uncovers his destiny, battles dark forces, and discovers the titular stone. The film’s charm lies in its unpolished wonder—a childlike awe at Diagon Alley’s cobblestones, the Great Hall’s floating candles, and Quidditch’s broomstick thrills—capturing a purity that feels like opening a storybook for the first time. John Williams’ iconic score, with its twinkling celesta, wraps every scene in enchantment, making Hogwarts a home for millions.Yet, this inaugural chapter, while magical, is a touch raw compared to the saga’s later peaks, particularly the masterful Deathly Hallows: Part 2. The young cast’s inexperience shows in stilted moments, and Columbus’ straightforward direction, while faithful, lacks the stylistic depth Alfonso Cuarón or David Yates later brought. The pacing wobbles slightly, with some scenes feeling like charming but extended book illustrations. Still, these are mere growing pains in a film bursting with heart—Harry’s wide-eyed discovery, Hagrid’s warmth (Robbie Coltrane), and Snape’s enigmatic menace (Alan Rickman) lay a foundation so sturdy it carried an eight-film legacy.What sets Philosopher’s Stone apart is its untainted joy, a magic born of beginnings that no sequel, not even the epic Deathly Hallows: Part 2, could replicate. It’s the film that started it all, inviting us to believe in wands, friendship, and courage. While not as refined as the series’ crescendo, its imperfections are part of its spell—a nostalgic, slightly rough gem that taught us to dream. For that, it remains an eternal classic, the wand flick that lit a generation’s imagination.