Here

audience Reviews

, 59% Audience Score
  • Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
    The thought that we are lucky of being in the same place that many things happened some time ago is curious, our story never will happened again.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    Someone's pathetic senior art project at NYU. Masturbatory vapid cringe.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    I cut this one slack because the ending is beautiful. The rest of the movie is both fragmented and aloof. It’s a shame, because there is a place this movie is headed. It just gets lost enroute.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Reexamining "Here": A More Balanced Perspective Critical Context: The reviews initially presented a highly critical view of the film, but your statement suggests there are deeper layers of artistic merit worth exploring. This highlights the subjective nature of film criticism and the importance of looking beyond surface-level critiques. Artistic Complexity: The film appears to be an ambitious project that attempts to: Explore philosophical themes about life's unpredictability Utilize innovative technological approaches to storytelling Challenge traditional narrative structures Technological Innovation: The use of deep fake AI technology, while critiqued, represents an experimental approach to visual storytelling. Such technological explorations often push the boundaries of cinematic expression, even if they are not immediately embraced by all viewers. Narrative Approach: The fragmented storytelling and scene changes, initially perceived as a weakness, could be intentional artistic choices designed to: Reflect the non-linear nature of human experience Create a more immersive and thought-provoking viewing experience Challenge conventional narrative expectations Philosophical Undertones: The core message—embracing life's unpredictability and maintaining personal passions—is a profound and universal theme. The film's approach to communicating this message may be more nuanced than initial criticisms suggest. Performance Considerations: Robin Wright's performance, constrained as it may have been, could be viewed as a deliberate artistic choice rather than a limitation. Recommendation: To fully appreciate the film, it would be beneficial to: Approach it with an open mind Consider the artistic intentions behind its unique storytelling approach Recognize the potential value in experimental cinematic techniques Conclusion: "Here" emerges as a potentially misunderstood work that challenges conventional filmmaking expectations. Its value may lie not in traditional narrative satisfaction, but in its innovative approach to storytelling and philosophical exploration. Would you be willing to share more about what you found compelling about the film? Your perspective could provide valuable insights into its artistic merits.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    It is really rare these days to see some established director and actors to take on something that experimental. Not everything worked but I really enjoyed seeing something that is not a typical cookie cutter production and presentation.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Robert Zemeckis, Alan Silvestri, Tom Hanks and Robin Wright all reunited after making Forest Gump together back in 94! A very clever film that although is shot entirely from one camera angle still manages to grab your attention due to the great acting and imaginative scene melding whilst pulling at your heart strings with a very well written script. If you loved “Forest Gump” then “Here” is well worth a watch 👍👏👏👏
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    I can understand why this would get low ratings from most people. However, having dealt with my grandma having alzheimers passing in 2017 after being married to my grandpa for 66 years and my grandpa passing this year, living in the same house for 65 of those years this movie hit me deep. Took awhile to grab my attention and feel like they could've done a better job wrapping all the story lines together, but the last 25 mins is what gave it the 4 stars for me.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    Unique perspective of the space that you are standing in right now. And what it took to get to this moment. This movie did not get great reviews. But I appreciate the story of how fast life goes and it keeps rolling with or without us.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    In spite of the all star cast, this movie is awful. Great deep fake AI to turn Tom Hanks back in to a kid but that's the best part about it.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    it unique way to present a storyline