In The Earth

audience Reviews

, 24% Audience Score
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    This movie shows that Rotten tomatoes needs a change of the top critics. It's one of the worst movies I have ever seen..a few psychedelic effects do not make a good movie
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    worst movie ive ever watched, nothing is showed, everything is confusing, plot has absolute no sense and the sounds and lights gave me headaches
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Hallucinations galore. Felt like I hallucinated the entire movie, no plot, just me being on mushrooms?
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    Utter, unspeakable rubbish. That a critic thought this was one of Wheatley's "better" efforts certainly doesn't say much about the rest of them. Just an excuse for boring psychedelic visuals - don't watch if you're epileptic, and don't watch if you aren't.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Never gets over the top to become what it looks like it might be. The ending was too abrupt and did not clarify or make more sense of anything despite the flashy end effort.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    Is pure cosmic horror, Is better than a very know movie about a forest with Natalie Portman
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    This movie was absolute trash. It was so slow, boring, and honestly just felt pointless. I couldn’t even finish the whole thing. Waste of time.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    Creepy and bloody fun. Plot is confusing and very out of sorts with no real explanation about what's going on but leaving it open for interpretation leaves this feeling more like art than a movie which isn't entirely a bad thing. The gore is beautiful and accurate and the scene with the flare was particularly masterful. Overall leaves you hungry for more answers and more run time.
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    Trash, boring, stupid, desperately trying to be edgy, horrible, dreadful, garbage.
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    Terrible plot and script - just really boring. Low budget is no excuse for such a dud. No surprise in the audience score. Can't see how the critics could give 80% - are they on the company payroll?