Juror #2
audience Reviews
, 91% Audience Score- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsI normally love Clint Eastwood movies....they are usually thoughtful, character driven pieces with amazing performances that ask interesting questions. Unfortunately, Juror #2 just wasn't hitting on any of Clint's normal cylinders. The acting was atrocious. Not sure how you have Toni Collette and JK Simmons in roles that don't give them anything interesting to do. This is movie of the week material here. The rest of the cast seemed like they were reading a high school play. The plot itself just is not interesting. I rooted against all of the characters and really didn't care where it was going. The only reason I watched until the end was to see what would happen and even that was incredibly disappointing....and I watched it for free on Max. Hard pass.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsClint can still direct a subtle masterpiece of a movie at 94. Amazing !
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsEnjoyed it but easily guessed what was going to happen.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsThis is string solid court thriller that shines, Without giving out any spoilers this is a must see if you want an intelligent well written and directed legal drama.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsi really enjoyed it - was this the best courtroom drama I've ever seen? no. but the story wasn't really about that... the story was about juror #2 & the moral dilemma he was facing. i thought it was a fairly fresh take on the subject matter & really quite thought provoking. i do wish, from an entertainment standpoint, that the ending had been different (see spoiler below), but overall I thought it was well done & would absolutely recommend it. <spoiler> I wish there had been a little bit of a twist. how effective would it have been if juror #2 hears the case, questions his actions, assumes he was the killer, throws the case off by asking questions because he knows the defendant is innocent only to turn the case around & end up in jail himself - & THEN we find out he actually did only hit a deer & the defendant was in fact guilty the entire time, living a free life while juror #2 sits in his jail cell, innocent. tragedy makes people feel things & that would've been a tragic ending. instead - it just ends. exactly how they told you it would end from the very beginning.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsQuesto è un grande fil che come minimo avrebbe meritato la candidatura all'Oscar miglio film. È notevole come il finale non ti lasci indifferente come quello molti altri film. La regia anche quella avrebbe meritato come minimo la candidatura all'Oscar
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsCourt room drama freak. Attention to detail is crucial and this case would never have gone to court! Detectives must have been on holiday. Poor!
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsMoral Dilemma!?!?! What else you need? It's really engaging bit slow, but I enjoyed.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsThoughtful writing and sometimes wrenching to the gut.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsA very good movie with lots of facet of judicial system. Believable story and well acted.