No Country for Old Men
audience Reviews
, 86% Audience Score- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsThe Coen Brothers really got this one right. Whole cast really shines convincingly, and then some, in their characters. Absolute winner. Great story, excellent directing and really good cinematography, which must have been really challenging. Lots of tense moments, action galore and enough twists. Suspense all round and just about non stop. Absolute must see
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsAs an exploration of Bell's existential confusion, it's fantastic.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsThe killer is good makes scarier
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsThis movie was really dissapointing. I came to it after reading all its praise but without spoiling anything just in case. Oh boy what a disaster. The whole premise of the movie lies on the ridiculous idea that a random person, after finding 2 million dollars in the middle of nowhere, without witnesses, would come back later just to give a dying gangster some water. Why???? wjy would any sane person do such a thing. And without that stupidity the movie wouldnt exist. Its a stupid movie where characters like the one played by tommy lee jones have absolutely no importance whatsoever. the movie would have been the same without him, and many others (woody harrelson is another perfect example). dont waste your time with this stupid movie.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsI wasted my time watching in this horrible movie.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsTHE perfect film. Every scene. Every line of dialogue. And the ending. Yes… I said it… the ending. All perfect.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsOne of the most creepy villains I have ever seen. Brilliant film!
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsLenta pero no por eso mala. Historia no demasiado entretenida, conveniencias y cosas sin explicar. No me convence
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsNo Country for Old Men is often praised as a cinematic masterpiece, but in reality, it’s a sluggish, over-hyped mess that collapses under its own weight. The pacing is painfully slow, mistaking long silences and drawn-out scenes for depth, when they just stall the plot and test your patience. Major plot points are left dangling with little payoff—like the off-screen death of a main character—which feels lazy rather than bold. The supposed symbolism gets lost in a hollow narrative that offers more questions than answers, and the ending feels less like a conclusion and more like the filmmakers just got bored. As an adaptation, it strips the novel of its emotional grit and philosophical clarity, leaving behind a film that’s more style than substance.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsThe Coen's masterpiece about fate, injustice and adapting for the future plus letting go of the past, even if its for the worse. This is a special kind of film, one that actually never holds the viewer's hand and challenges you to use your intellect. Guaranteed to keep you on the edge of your seat not only because of the directors and their quirky but very welcomed artistic decisions (not including any kind of soundtrack until the very end is one of them), but also because it includes one of the greatest performances of this century to date: Javier Bardem as the ruthless and nightmare-inducing hitman Anton Chigurh. This is a modern classic and one of the best movies of this century, one that will be seen in the future the same way we see movies like The Godfather nowadays.