Non-Fiction
critic Reviews
, 86% Certified Fresh Tomatometer Score- Well-acted and sharply written, Non-Fiction finds writer-director Olivier Assayas working in a comedic vein that channels classic forebears while remaining utterly fresh.
- , Rotten Tomatometer ScoreMark KermodeKermode & Mayo's Film Review
Two hours of French naval-gazing about smoking, drinking, complaining...
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreWendy IdeObserver (UK)
On balance, writer and director Assayas just about pulls it off: the film is uneven, certainly, but the fascinating, flawed characters reel us in.
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreKevin MaherTimes (UK)
It sounds farcical, but it's also a serious work from the writer-director Olivier Assayas and his key performers that interrogates the nature of literary value today through the words of uncommonly rounded and deeply appealing characters.
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreErika BalsomSight & Sound
Non-Fiction feels breezy, but this is a film in which, on multiple fronts, appearances don't tell the whole story.
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreRyan GilbeyNew Statesman
[Olivier] Assayas's innate interest in character prevents it from being dry or dusty.
Read full article - , Rotten Tomatometer ScoreDanny LeighFinancial Times
A meal made up of nothing but appetisers.
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreEddie Harrisonfilm-authority.com
…allows the audience to sit back and listen to the conversation, making up our own minds about the people involved. It’s this feel for dinner-party chat that makes Non-Fiction such a pleasure to participate in…
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreViolet LuccaHarper's Magazine
Olivier Assayas’s latest film holds on to the old world while recognizing the new.
Read full article - , Fresh Tomatometer ScoreGisela SavdieEl Heraldo
The movie takes unexpected turns, and moves between fiction and reality [Full review in Spanish]
Read full article - , Rotten Tomatometer ScoreYasser MedinaCinefilia
It questions, in the key of social criticism and long talks, the traps of the digital age, but its sophisticated side loses the effect of irony in a second half marked by redundancy and a excessive verbal transparency. [Full review in Spanish]
Read full article