Our Souls at Night
audience Reviews
, 76% Audience Score- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsVery wholesome movie was definitely a fan, didn't like the ending, could have made it better yet still worthwhile
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsFor context, I’m a 76 year old man. I have watched this movie at least five times, and I’ve enjoyed it every time. If you don’t enjoy it, wait till you’re 76. It will grow on you.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsGood but not great. Redford and Fonda are classic pros.
- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 starsLow key, beyond subtle, almost catatonic at times, buoyed by two legends. Redford excels better than Fonda.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsSometimes the simple beauty of a loving relationship is enough to drive away the anxieties of reality. A credit to Jane Fonda, Robert Redford and all the production team.
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsA sweet movie about aging, family, and community. It's pretty "aw shucks" overall, but has a lot of heart and a lot of good gentle reminders of the reality of getting old and managing family, relationships, and your own desires. Jane Fonda and Robert Redford anchor the movie so strongly and their performances are very endearing. There's nothing truly great about Our Souls at Night and that's okay - there's more than enough space for wholesome dramas like this.
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsBORING . Not serious Not funny Not entertaining
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsReally beautiful, sensitive film. So glad so see a slow, deep, real film coming out from America. It has a similar rhymth to Japanese films, able to portray something that isn't physical. A film where you come away with the negative space as much as the filming itself.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsThis is a beautifully rendered story, extraordinarily well-acted. It builds slowly, offering a window into the wisdom of older people who benefit from new connection, easing both loneliness and the consequences of old scars.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsNo Happy end, what a disappointing ending