Peter Pan's Neverland Nightmare
audience Reviews
, 71% Audience Score- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsIt actually scared me a few times, the end had less kills than i was hoping for, but overall the movie is a MUST
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsChildhood ruined. This movie ruined my childhood. I have never seen it before but im just reviewing it. Look how they massacred Tinker Bell! She looks like a homeless woman that scares children!! And plus, SHE'S A FULL BLOWN HUMAN NOT A FAIRY!!! This movie sucks. Just sayin.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsAs someone who’s a fan of both the classic Peter Pan and horror, Peter Pan's Neverland Nightmare really caught my attention—and it delivered in ways I didn’t expect. The actor who played Peter was amazing, and the actress behind Tinkerbell completely stole the spotlight. Tinkerbell was easily the standout character for me. The script was pretty simple, but that actually worked in its favor. It kept things grounded and still managed to surprise me in a few key moments. I found out the film was partly inspired by The Black Phone, and interestingly, it included some things I wish The Black Phone had done. That made the experience even better for me personally. The home invasion scenes were grim and unsettling—not flashy, just quietly disturbing in the best horror sense. They lingered with me long after. There are also a bunch of mysteries woven through the story, many of which remain unanswered. The ending especially left me questioning a lot. I need to know what happens next. This movie left me both excited and a bit haunted—in the best possible way.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsAs long as you don't think this has anything to do with Peter Pan then you'll be right. Stupid mistakes made by the victims in all American movies.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars**Review: 3/5 – Peter Pan’s Neverland Nightmare** Alright, so *Peter Pan’s Neverland Nightmare* is exactly what I signed up for—a dark, bloody spin on a childhood classic, and honestly? I kinda loved it. The plot’s barebones—Peter kidnaps kids, chaos ensues—but it *works*. It’s simple, creepy, and way more effective than it has any right to be. The acting’s fine, nothing Oscar-worthy, but everyone plays their twisted parts well enough. Special effects? Surprisingly solid. Gory without feeling cheap. Compared to *Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey*, this is a full-blown *glow up*. Neverland is grimy and gory, and while I missed the magic of the original, this horror version still scratches that dark fairytale itch. It’s not perfect—some clunky bits for sure—but as a fan of the TCU/Poohniverse, I’m *in*. If this is the direction we're headed, count me all the way in for the next deranged fairytale chapter.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsUna buena pelicula donde va directo al punto es hasta ahora la mejor pelicula de poohniverse habia pocos momentos flojos pero en ningun momento se aburre
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsIT'S SO MUCH FUN/ I LOVED IT
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starswaisting time. I been go out in the midle movie
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsthis had so much potential but ended up being SO bad it's boring, they really fumbled on this, story idea was good, but makeup is really bad, actors suck, hope they think something better for the future
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsI obviously went in with no expectations, and I was genuinely surprised. It’s original, delivers solid scares, and doesn’t fall into the kind of comedic satire seen in Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey.