Reprisal

Bruce Willis mesmo como coadjuvante tinha e sempre teve muita presença s2… Uma boa trama, como todo filme de ação exagerado e impossível, a forma de solução do mistério em torno do autor dos assaltos também foi meio que num passe de mágica, desconsiderando esses pequenos detalhes, um filme de ação policial e tiroteio razoável…

An acting no show masterclass by Bruce Wills this is a ridiculously dumb and boring crime thriller that is more laughable than thrilling

They lost me when five-plus police cruisers couldn't catch one bad guy on a motorcycle. The cops can't hit the broadside of a barn with their handguns, but everyone has endless rounds. It takes Bruce Willis (thrown into the show) to finally shoot the bad guy with a shotgun at close range.

All it has is a uninterested Bruce.

This actually wasn't a bad movie at all, had a lot of suspense throughout. Why he knew so much about tactics know-how is his past job he had been in security before he was in banking. I really didn't miss Bruce being a big part of the movie it was good, and I strongly recommend watching it's a lot of fun!

Not nearly as bad as the reviews here would suggest. I've lost count of how many films I've given up on half way through. Reprisal kept my attention to the end. Other reviews talk of clichés but several are avoided here - for example the inevitable snapped twig, ringing phone or similar that gives away the hero watching the villain is avoided nicely here - the fact that it's avoided adding to the tension because you're convinced it's going to happen.

Bank heist gone wrong. Bank manager wants revenge, but then the robber gets revenge on the revenger. Look, the cast and acting is pretty good. But the story makes ZERO sense. Why does the bank manager go after the robber? Because he can't sleep? And then he assaults the guy and takes the loot? What? Then there is a bunch of extraneous stuff I cannot explain. Why is Bruce Willis even in this? His character was completely superfluous. Ditto the girl with diabetes. Willis has done a string of these bad action cameos. He must need money.

The least believable thing about this movie is Frank Grillo as a bank manager. It was exactly what I expected. Light. Action. Nothing too cerebral. Frank Grillo and Bruce Willis in a straight to streaming, low budget action flick. Manage your expectations and your won't be disappointed. Olivia Culpa is watchable as the wife.

I figured: "Bruce Willis is in it so how bad could it be?" Well...it was a fecal remnant. Poor writing, bad acting, crummy directing, and it looked like it was edited by a chimpanzee that was on a cocaine jag. If you sat in a dark room and head yourself in the head with a hammer for 2 hours, you'd have a more enjoyable time. Do not bother.

A barely watchable bank heist flick - that takes the POV of the bank manager who's been traumatized by the event. Well, at least most of the way. It's one of those revenge movies that really doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Frank Grillo, as the bank manager, is weak and scared and traumatized by the opening event until... well, until he's suddenly willing to attack a well-armed assassin and steal the maurader's loot... yeah, doesn't make sense. One could say that his daughter's diabetes has hurt the family financially... but then, we'd just be making excuses for this movie to make sense -- and as much as the writer tried, it feels forced and contrived. Bruce Willis basically sleepwalks through this. And somehow in the end, must be in every scene. But IMO the problems lie in the script. It lacks subtlety and cohesion to make it flow. It's like this story was conceived and executed on the fly. Not worth your time.