Singularity
audience Reviews
, 43% Audience Score- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsThis movie Singularity 2017 are suck bad, the lower education didn't know how to run that they are following by video bugs camera on them, and they acting very bad for not protecting themselves enough in the end of the world times. This movie didn't make me felt extremely excited. Boring those actress of girl and actor boy are not good to play this movie of the combat soldier. Stupid movie.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsJust an incredibly mediocre and underwhelming film that had some potential. I guess the concept was good, albeit familiar and a bit derivative. I watched it free on streaming and can't say it was even worth the time. I'm surprised John Cusack did this film. He's better than this.
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsSingularity (2017), starring John Cusack, attempts to explore the dangers of artificial intelligence in a post-apocalyptic setting. Unfortunately, we found the movie to be a frustrating experience from start to finish. Cusack's performance, which we had hoped would bring some much-needed energy to the film, was lackluster and uninspired. The pacing dragged, and the film's low-budget CGI often took us out of the moment, leaving little for us to engage with emotionally. We were particularly disappointed by the film's inability to capitalize on its interesting premise. What could have been a gripping exploration of AI and the future of humanity quickly turned into a predictable and uninspired storyline. Watching Singularity felt more like a chore than entertainment, and one of us even joked that they'd rather be caught in an embarrassing situation by their kids than be seen watching this film again. There wasn’t much we could point to as redeeming. The visuals were uninspired, and the dialogue was clunky at best. Some of us skipped out on watching better films to sit through this, and it felt like wasted time. The humor we found in reviewing the film came more from our shared frustration than from anything the movie itself provided. In the end, we all agreed that Singularity was a waste of time. Between its weak plot, flat acting, and uninspired execution, it left us with little to recommend. We rated it across the board from an F to our lowest possible score, a W (Waste of Time), and we wouldn’t recommend it to anyone looking for a quality sci-fi experience.
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsRotten tomatoes is just corrupted it’s cuz John cusack got canceled this is a great movie
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars"Singularity" struggles to deliver a compelling narrative, faltering under the weight of clichéd plot points and predictable twists. Despite its ambitious attempt to explore complex themes, the film falls short in execution, with underdeveloped characters and lackluster dialogue. The visual effects, while initially impressive, soon become repetitive and fail to compensate for the story's lack of depth. The movie's pacing is uneven, making it challenging to maintain interest throughout. Overall, "Singularity" misses the mark in delivering a thought-provoking or entertaining experience, leaving much to be desired in both storytelling and cinematic innovation.
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsThis movie stunk so bad, I started to think it was me. Why in the world was this made?
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsI found it quite enjoyable once it got moving. I'm no film critic just your average run of the mill movie viewer. I liked it enough to want to see the sequel, and than I actual searched the net to see if there is one.
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsA class B movie whose formula is 70% "Terminator Salvation", 20% "Matrix" and 9% of all the platitudes that exist in this subgenre.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starspossibly the thinnest movie to waste time watching. The plot is incoherent. John Cusack stands around looking bored having dialled in his performance. The film start makes no sense with no credible or reasonable backstory. the main plot has a super AI with no clue as to where Aurora is but seems capable of finding the one person who knows where it is, yet goes still on some random journey with a 'robot' to find something that's eventually off world .. eh! where did the few remaining survivors get the tech?. it's filled with convenient and limp plot armour such as allowing them the two lead characters to escape something that wiped out the entire population without so much as an explanation!
- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 starsThe premise for this film was good; the takeover of the earth by a super computer and the destruction of humanity by that all-controlling super computer. However I did not find the movie very good. The acting was okay but somewhat wooden. The story was not that interesting and had implausible parts, for instance the human forms of the computer program creator and his second in command being sustained in holographic form by the super computer. The speed of the takeover and destruction of humanity was not believable. The saving of a human and a human-looking android by an alien computer civilisation was bizarre. The existence and purpose of the android was not very clear. The major premise of the movie was also illogical. The super-computer was supposed to end all wars. It worked out that humans caused wars, a stroke of genius for a super-computer. It would surely require vast amounts of research and computing resources for an AI computer to come up with that logical deduction. The super-computer then decides that in order to reach its goal it should destroy all humanity. The genius super-computer did not seem to be able to work out that the reason for ending all wars would be to stop the destruction of humanity. The genius super-computer was obviously not a deep-thinker. I don't think the authors of the screenplay had heard about Deep Thought when they wrote the script. The ending of the film is set up in such a way as to allow a follow-up movie. I won't be watching it.