Starve Acre

audience Reviews

, 52% Audience Score
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    A slow burner that generates a genuine atmosphere of dread.
  • Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
    Technically, 'Starve Acre' is a well-crafted film, though the practical animal effects were somewhat lacking. The acting is strong, and the musical score complements the melancholy atmosphere perfectly. The English countryside setting, which I believe is meant to evoke the 1970s, is beautifully captured. As an American, I found the accents a bit challenging, but the performances seemed solid. However, despite the film's technical merits, the pacing is incredibly slow. The first thirty minutes are particularly uneventful, bordering on tedious. While the cinematography and sound design are sublime, the story itself struggles to maintain interest. And let's be honest, the leading man's appearance is... unique. He resembles a cross between an Easter Island statue and a goblin, with prominent ears that are quite distracting. The film feels like a 'nothing burger' until a sudden, bizarre ending arrives. While logically sound, the conclusion feels abrupt and somewhat nonsensical. I suspect the folktale it's based on might offer a more compelling narrative. In summary, 'Starve Acre' is technically impressive but ultimately hampered by its slow pacing and an odd, unsatisfying conclusion. It's an aesthetically pleasing film, but not one that delivers a particularly engaging story.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    Slow and creepy vibe. Felt like an old folk tale.
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    I can’t believe I paid a tenner to watched this. It shocks me how films like this get made. Was so up for a great British horror with Matt smith, thought it was going to be ‘calibre’ vibes. It’s soooooo bad genuinely don’t watch it. Makes no sense and it’s sooo boring.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Maybe I wasn’t paying close enough attention but I really didn’t get it.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    Slow burn that created gradually creeping dread, with hints of dark rites and ancient pagan evil. Excellent acting and atmosphere, but the abstract and vague story made for an unsatisfying ending. Nonetheless I enjoyed this film overall.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    If upsetting folk horror is your thing then 2024's 'Starve Acre' will be right up your street. SYNOPSIS: 'An idyllic rural family life of a couple is thrown into turmoil when their son starts acting out of character.' This film is brilliantly carried by its leads Matt Smith and Morfydd Clark. And based on their history within the genre then you wouldn't expect any less. This is very much the thinking person's horror film as there are metaphors aplenty and the line between pagan folklore and psychodrama is very much blurred. The film is awash in recognisable tropes of the subgenre, and maybe it wallows in the themes of grief and loss a bit too much for this to be an enjoyable experience. It's very much a hard slog in places. 'Starve Acre' is a beautifully dreary, miserable thing that soaks into the bones with its oppressive atmosphere. Tough love at its best. 8/10
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    This was probably one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. It was all over the place and terrible. Disappointed I wasted my time watching this.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Daniel Kokotajlo directed this British film, which was based on Andrew Michael Hurley's novel of the same title. The film stars Matt Smith, Morfydd Clark, and Erin Richards. The story follows a couple who live in the countryside for fresh air with their young son, who suffers from asthma and dies one day as a result of an asthma attack. The pair then performs a ritual to unleash the dark forces. The film has no horror scenes, and we are not supposed to be scared of an old rabbit skeleton that comes to life or the discovery of ancient tree roots. The movie may entice the viewers with its moderate filmmaking but it has nothing to entertain the audience with its lame content.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    I loved the book, so it definitely played in my opinion of the movie adaptation. This movie starts in the good direction, putting efforts in the atmosphere of the horror folk tale genre and building the relationship amongst the members of the family and the coming drama. Sadly, it starts to crumble after the first half hour, slowly getting away, to end up being a vulgar and confusing story, taking out the symbolic and enigmatics of the book, to replace it with a classic cheap satanic cult type of horror story, with clumsy exposition and elements that had nothing to do with the original story, maybe to please the cheap horror movie fans hoping to get their pound of flesh. The book by Andrew Michael Hurley is not a horror book. It's a gothic tale centered around grief. It's deliciously dark, ominous and eerie. It's sad and poetic. This movie tries to explain what shouldn't be and end up even more confusing.