The Aeronauts
audience Reviews
, 95% Audience Score- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsHistory and facts matter people. This actually happened and both of them were male. SMH.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsWhat an absolutely lovely movie. It kept me glued for the whole duration. The chemistry between the two leads make this movie a magical one to watch and one that shouldn't be missed.
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsTom Harper’s The Aeronauts offers a glimpse into the daring early efforts to explore the atmosphere and understand weather patterns. While the plot centers on meteorologist James Glaisher (Eddie Redmayne) and fictional balloonist Amelia Wren (Felicity Jones), the film’s true focus is nature's raw, uncontrollable power and humanity’s attempts to study it. The depiction of atmospheric hazards is gripping and feels authentic, even as it occasionally stretches historical accuracy. As Glaisher and Wren ascend in their hot air balloon, they face intense turbulence, freezing temperatures, and the suffocating effects of oxygen deprivation. These challenges are portrayed with harrowing intensity, showcasing the genuine risks faced by 19th-century scientists. However, the film’s claim of reaching over 37,000 feet—a height that would have been nearly impossible with the technology of the time—leans more into cinematic spectacle than strict realism. What stands out most is the characters’ responses to these dangers. Glaisher’s relentless drive to gather data reflects the spirit of scientific discovery, even when personal safety is at stake. Meanwhile, Wren’s resourcefulness and calm under pressure serve as a reminder of the importance of preparation and quick thinking in the face of the unknown. Together, they embody the balance between ambition and respect for nature’s immense power. Despite its dramatizations, The Aeronauts delivers a powerful message about humanity’s relationship with the natural world. It’s a thrilling adventure and a poignant reminder of the courage and ingenuity required to advance our understanding of the environment.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsoutstanding. edge of seat stuff. compelling
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsMy compliments go mainly to the art and set design of this film. Well done, visually. I'm reluctant to believe that any human would be able to sustain adequate brain function at an altitude of 37,000 feet for more than 5 minutes (maximum)?? without oxygen supply. Then again, I wasn't there so I am not at liberty to say. But we DO know that aircraft have crashed after the depressurization of the cabin at an altitude of 33,000 feet, at which point humans are unlikely to stay COMPLETELY conscious for more than 6 minutes before hypoxia sets in and clouds your basic judgment and bodily functions. Anyway, this was still a Hollywood movie and what do I know?!
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsGreat acting, inspiring story, very well executed
- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsUn drama de época, con excelente fotografía y efectos especiales que ayudan a comprender la ciencia meteorológica… Inspirada en hechos reales; combinación entre emoción y nostalgia.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsOK THAT WAS VERY GOOD ACTUALLY
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsDon't let a lot of facts get in the way of a good story..........artistic license is one thing, but this is a little much, I'm sorry. Hard to take seriously. Good for young kids I guess.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsA complete lie of the actual history. Such a shame because this is a cool story.