The Batman

audience Reviews

, 87% Audience Score
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Was worried about Robert Pattinson playing Batman even though he is a great actor but what a terrific job he did as Batman. Hope to see more of him as this quiet dark vibe Batman they made him to be. Great cast and great story line. The 3 hour movie run time was perfect and a great ride let's hope the rest are just as long and great
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    Props to the Reeves for making something different. I think they overextended the ending, but just a little bit. • First Batman film I see with Batman's narration at the beggining, just like any Batman comic. No one did it before. • Best Batman film with Batman as a "vigilante". • One of the best, if not the best film, Gotham Cityies. Very well acomplished. • Great Penguin. Really. • Good soundtrack. At some given moment there, it made me realize "geez, this guy really is Batman". Not bad, seriously. You go watch it.
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    This movie is the worst Batman film created. How it got a high percentage is beyond me. The acting from all the characters is SO BAD! I knew from the beginning, with the dramatic narration from Robert Patterson, that this movie was going to be trash. Clearly the people who gave this a high rating were in fact, high, and have never seen the Christian Bale and Heath Leger series. Patterson is not a sophisticated businessman, but instead a little boy who hasn't dealt with any of his trauma. Not to mention half the time he looks like a bad representation of Edward Sissorhands. Alfred has maybe 4 minutes total of screen time but yet we are supposed to feel something for him. I mean Alfred has no common sense? He opens the envelope that has "evil" writing on it, addressed to BATMAN and not Bruce Wayne and doesn't see any red flags? Seems reasonable. I could go on and on! Ugh, I can't get that 3 hours back. Lesson learned. Oh, one more thing.... in the movie, they don't call batman... batman. His name is Vengence. *eye twitch*
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    Omg just 3 hours wasted if watched on 2x speed I might of at least got a lol absolute garbage did fast forward as much as I could film was 3 hours 3 hours too long 0 would been better sorry but I watched it all so
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    It was a fresh take on the Batman. If you still don't have enough of Batman you can watch this one and you will be entertained.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    I had high hopes given the reviews. Sadly disappointed. From the overall story, soundtrack (seriously playing essentially the same soundtrack through the whole thing) to the whole batman persona. Making the Wayne's death a scandal goes against the entire back story and takes away the true origin. Instead of a vengeful batman, we got a depressed boy that has no real purpose. Overall, the story had so many side stories it was distracting and each plot felt unfinished. I could go on and on so to sum it up, George Clooney made a better Batman.
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    This movie sucked! I can't believe you all think it's great. You have anorexic , drug addict, looking guy , with no real physique beating up all these guys that are twice his size. You could breathe on him and he'd break!
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    It was good but I wish they didn't have any kiss scenes in it, it kinda throws off the vibe of the Riddler trying to get people to remember the orphanages where children died due to the poor conditions.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    Its probably the most realistic Batman to date on terms of realism. Batman gets hurt a few times which you would figure given that he doesn't have super powers. The villians were all classics but not their typical cartoony selves which fit with the realism motif but was such a departure from all the other Batman movies. Casting was fine aside from the race swapping. At least the swapped characters were cast correctly personality-wise. Its fine and the length doesnt bother me but I prefer the more unrealistic cartoony versions of Batman better.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    So I loved The Batman, was always 💯 bought in on Battinson because I love his work, I actually haven't seen Twilight but will soon I thought the movie was a technical work of art that Picasso gave his blessings too. In a CGI heavy world, you forget how genuine it is to have something in front of a camera and it was extremely refreshing to see most if not all effects were real and that helped with the grounded tone of the movie. Nice standalone superhero movie that isn't worried about making a larger universe, the MCU is the only one that can successfully pump out movies like that for now. The acting was the best overall acting in a Batman movie to date. Perfect casting, it makes sense that Batman would be a loner at first bc he's a fucking psychopath, and it's early in his Batman career so he's learning and doesn't understand yet that being Bruce Wayne can also help. I also feel that Zoe Kravits and Jeffrey Wright have been under appreciated for years (I saw Kimi the other day, good movie) and I hope these performances project their careers even more forward. And OMG if you would have given me 20 guesses to who plays Penguin I would not have guessed Colin Ferell, he wasnt in it much, but stole the scene every time he was on screen except for his last scene. Gotham looked fantastic, you see the ins and outs at day and night. The high class, the low class, vert Chicago esque (which is what I feel is the closest lifelike Gotham) the people were very much apart of Gotham and it was outstanding. Musical score was great but the weakest element of the movie for me. The Batman Theme was almost over played but Riddlers Ave Maria was not needed as his theme haha. But I did get chills when he started singing it. Weakest element yes but not saying much bc it was fantastic. And I have to say, the cinematography of this film was bar none, helped make this movie a fantastic piece of cinematic 24k gold. Not much more to say if you've seen it. I know a lot of people are complaining about the 3rd act, but it's a Batman movie and you need something big like a flood in a Batman movie in my opinion, to truly show how bigger then life Batman is. The pacing does change (compared to the perfection of the first 2 acts) but after the interrogation scene I feel it's appropriate to match the intensity of the elevated stakes. My other eyebrow raiser were the masks, I thought the costume design was oscar worthy, some of them were off to me, Riddlers mask was on unnecessary to me and really took away from Paul Danos amazing performance, in the comics he just covers his eyes and that would have been better, also Catwoman really cant get anything better than a $2 ski mask to match her $500 leather BDM suit? Im willing to forgive Batmans mask bc it's early on his career and he'll improve in it bc it's leather aesthetic makes sense for his character arc. And what I disagree with most critics is the chemistry, ppl didnt buy it between Batman and Catwoman but I felt it was appropriate for people who just met. I simply loved this movie, and I hope other people do to. As disappointed as I am for them not continuing the Snyderverse and what the rumored plans are to wipe away what he's done, I am not blind to greatness. I dont think this movie is better than The Dark Knight, but this movie will def rank high on, not just my Batman list, but any movie