The Gracefield Incident
audience Reviews
, 17% Audience Score- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsAwful. A W F U L. Awful. Awful. Awful. Awful. Awful. Awful. Awful. A W F U L Easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my entire life without question. None of these people should ever act in a movie again. Ever. It's THAT bad. Holy hell. 0.5/10
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsThe characters spend 90% of their time just yelling each other's names. I spent most of my time just wishing they'd all die. Someone decided to use YELLOW balloons for a creepy factor, instead of the red ones that Pennywise in IT had. Don't bother.
- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 starsWell, this is bit weird. While this movie is ridiculous (many things don't add up) it was hard not to keep watching. The special effects weren't bad at all and it was a bit creepy. I laughed numerous times at things they did while making this movie that were super obvious mistakes. Like, how can balloons fly when they're filled with air from your lungs? Lol. Or guy has camera in his hand pointing at the ground but every time they show his perspective through the camera, it's shooting up at the person he's speaking to. Lots of that kind of stuff. Also, I felt like I was watching completely different actors when they were not in the scene but you could hear their voice vs. when they were on camera. Can't explain it but it was very odd. Off camera, they were horrible but on camera, some of them weren't so bad. I'm so confused by this film lmao.
- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars2 and a half possibly. If your looking for a more modern found footage horror/general found footage film to restore your faith in the genre this isn't it. It is eye popping and has great visuals at times.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsParts Of It Were Perfectly Timed In Terms Of Achieving A Scare-Jump Reaction. I Personally Found It A Reasonable Good Mix Of Sci-Fi & Story. It Had Clearly A Low-Budget, So A Need Was Required To Get Clever With The Suspence; Channeling The Blair Witch Project Camera Work, It Does Effectively Freak You At Times..It's A Great Idea, But Very Hard To Do Well, Even With A Big Budget (Such As Cloverfield) ..But All In All, I Felt This Did Okay. Doesn't Go Overly Long Either, Which Also Helps.
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsAnother sci-fi movie with aliens where mankind is represented by its most stupid individuals.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsacting is atrocious and dialogue is abysmal. some of the worst i've ever seen of both. started out well, intriguing and creepy with some good scares. then it nose-dives. so many of the scares were so weak, nothing shown on the screen, just some loud noises you hear and the characters run, super lame. the arguing between the characters was ridiculously annoying. lots of questionable decision making. and a ton of plot holes and things that make no sense. (1 viewing) SPOILERS they're filling balloons that float as they walk through the forest, but they don't have a helium tank. dude is recording with a camera from a smart phone that he put in his fake eye, but it somehow records sound. bad continuity errors like, they show the view of one person's camera, then when they switch to the other person's camera the first person isn't holding a camera. the aliens looked pretty cool, and some of the stuff with them at the very end were the only cool/scary/creepy parts. and the meteorite turning out to be an egg with a baby alien in it was pretty cool.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsOne of the dumbest, nonsense, forgettable movie i have ever seen.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 starsAlthough this film did not have the best aciting performances or an original plot, it made up for this by keeping me thrilled (never a dull moment) and being above average scary all the way through to the end. If you are looking for extremely high special effects do not watch this film. If special effects that are better than the fake looking "the asylum's " knock off blockbuster films would work for you then watch this movie.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsSeriously bad. And Mathieu Ratthe is a terrible actor