Things Will Be Different

audience Reviews

, 42% Audience Score
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    this movie lacks everything, talent, writing, originality you name it. what a total waste of time. who writes this garbage, better yet who's funding this? more than likely its a tax write-off for someone and we have to suffer for it.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    A rather intimate sci-fi story with two capable leads, limited but effective score and astonishingly well done photography. To not answer every open question should not be a flaw, but the way the action sometimes grinds to a halt, makes the plot holes painfully obvious. In the end, all the interesting ingredients cannot completely save the film from its mediocre execution.
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    Dull boring, stupid garabage
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Interesting premise. But, like a lot of good ideas that aren't fleshed out, it turns into a mess of unexplained inconsistencies and giant plot holes. At one point she says she doesn't want her daughter to grow up without her. Yet, she's traveled through time and now assumes she's getting back when it's made clear that going back in time is not as easy as it seems. This is the sort of story that belongs in an episodic series that allows a building of the backstory that cannot be fixed with a couple expositional conversations between the two protagonists.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Lacks depth and any good explaination or resolution.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Interesting and hooks you with the sense of mystery it creates, but then it explains nothing. By the end you are just left with more questions and a feeling you've probably wasted a couple of hours.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    This movie … ugh. So many holes and confusing. The suspense/mystery part was intriguing but by the time it was over I felt like I wasted my time. The writing and character motivations often didn’t make sense to me. I had to go to Reddit to get any kind of answers and even there it was all guesswork. It’s not like I missed something.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    I'm sure there's a very interesting movie in here, somewhere, full of nuance, plot twists, foreshadowing, allegory and metaphors. Too bad it's all inside Michael Felker's brain. Maybe he'll do a reboot one day and let us all know about it.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    I didn't realize it while watching but somehow I missed the opening up until the point where the kids "drunkards"in the car are messing around on the house property and the leads chase them away. But watching it from the beginning didn't help my confusion as it's never explained about the brothers friend who gave him the notebook, or really anything else. I was hoping there was a book that I could read and get a better telling of the story. Suffice it to say I was simply confused about what they did and were trying to do and what the house was and who the people on the cassette player were. Nothing made sense especially the end where you know he's gone back dozens of times with the same result. Why would she shoot him from that? How about just leave the diner with the money and hide out in a hotel? Why did he show up at the diner at all? He could have shot himself. Nothing makes sense so it gets 3 stars for potential as a sci Fi story and for the actors and the set and scenes...it felt a little like MYST when they open the door and you are 1st person looking around a room with items from different times. That's about it.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    A slow burn time travel movie that doesn't really spin until the final third. As with most movies like this, the only way to break the cycle it is death. While it was predictable, it is worth watching.