War of the Worlds: The Attack
audience Reviews
, 8% Audience Score- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsIt was better than the new Snow White.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsIf you have ADHD and need something on in the background this is so thrillingly bad that it makes sense, 4 stars I can definitely get my vacuuming done thanks to lack of interest
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsOh gosh! That was so absolutely terrible. There was literally no ending. It was almost as if the writer ‘ended’ the plot by saying “just kidding guys!! There was no alien threat!” The antagonist just disappeared. This movie is the very definition of anticlimactic.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsTerrible British remake. If u have any kind of faith based leanings, beliefs or lifestyle, stay away from this garbage; it’s insulting & ridiculous in it’s portrayal of believers & worse yet of scripture- one character referring to it as “gibberish”…
- Rating: 1.5 out of 5 starsThe movie was bad it looked horrible. but credit where credit is do the martians at least were decent and were book accurate in looks. it was set in the real Horsell Common. I'm giving it 1.5, as its probably the worst movie I've ever watched. The cover art looks like a blend of Bad ai and poor modeling.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsHow on earth did this mess get to production stage?
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsThis movies was very cheesy, and horrendous. Only thing exciting was the martians.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsCorporal Fred?? really though? How about Sargent Major Gus... Cringe!!!
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsThis one is a genuine stinker. No character development, plot holes that you could drive a tank through, CGI so obvious it's not even funny. It looks like an attempt from a budding high school film maker who somehow managed to get hold of enough money to make a feature film with his friends.
- Rating: 0.5 out of 5 starsYet another UK low quality production with an underline and unnecessary bad mouthing of Christianity.